Council's legal bill over asylum hotel revealed

Simon DedmanEssex political reporter
Reuters Two men in T-shirts and shorts walking with their backs to the camera towards The Bell Hotel.  There is a metal fence in front of the hotel building.Reuters
Epping Forest District Council has taken the hotel's owners to court to try to stop asylum seekers staying there

A council's High Court action to attempt to stop asylum seekers from living at an Essex hotel has cost £277,425 so far, the BBC has learned.

Epping Forest District Council won an interim injunction to close The Bell Hotel in Epping to migrants in August, but it was overturned by the Court of Appeal.

The council lost its most recent High Court challenge and is looking to appeal against that decision.

The figure revealed is the legal bill for the council, which has yet to respond to a request for comment, and does not include any costs the authority might have to cover or any further legal action.

Chris Pond, leader of Loughton Residents' Association, the second-largest group on the authority, said: "I think when you are engaging leading counsel, you are obviously talking about a big bill. It was the only option they had at the time."

The hotel, in High Road, became a focal point for protests and counter-protests over the summer after an asylum seeker living there was arrested - and later convicted and deported - for the sexual assaults of a teenage girl and a woman.

Councillors met privately last month and most decided to continue taking High Court action.

The Liberal Democrats were opposed, however, and group leader Jon Whitehouse argued: "The legal costs will be even higher now following the council's decision in November to spend more time and money in the courts.

"Residents have gained nothing from court action so far."

But Pond countered: "I don't think the extra costs will be that significant. Most of them have already been incurred. I think we have got to pursue it. And I think the local residents would support that".

The council has applied to the Court of Appeal to challenge the judgement last month that an injunction was "not an appropriate means of enforcing planning control".

The authority is waiting to hear if the appeal will be successful.

Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.