| You are in: Entertainment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, 18 February, 2003, 10:36 GMT
TV licence fee rises by £4
Popular shows like Casualty are funded by the licence fee
A £4 increase in the TV licence fee is expected to be announced by Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell on Monday.
The increase, which is 1.5% above the rate of inflation, would bring the cost of the annual fee to £116, providing the BBC with about £100m in extra revenue. It is in line with a formula set out in 2000, following a review of the future funding of the BBC by an independent review panel.
Last month she announced there would be a review of the compulsory licence fee beyond 2006. Critics want it to be abolished, claiming it is poor value for money and gives the corporation an unfair advantage over its commercial competitors. Last month Barry Cox, the deputy chairman of Channel 4, said it should be abolished and part-funded by a subscription instead. In making the criticism, Mr Cox described the BBC as a "cultural tyranny". And in a newspaper survey in October, more than half of people questioned said it should be scrapped. The BBC is mostly funded by £2.3bn it receives annually from TV households paying the licence fee.
The BBC said the previous licence fee settlement under former Culture Secretary Chris Smith in 2000 had required the corporation to match increases with "very tough" self-help targets. "Since the settlement we have cut overheads from 24% to 15%, ahead of target," said a spokesman. "Our aim is to ensure as much money as possible is invested in programmes."
Here are a selection of your comments on this subject.
Peter Rafferty, UK
Paying the TV licence is worth it just for Eastenders!!! Let alone the news and everything else!
I am angry that I will be forced to pay more for a service which I cannot fully use. BBC 3 is not available to everyone and yet the BBC has the audacity to charge everyone more to fund these extra services.
Christine Guest, Canada
Prior to moving aboard from England I thought that the licence fee was a total waste. Now, after witnessing what other countries have I have totally reversed my opinion. The BBC sets a standard, a standard that would be eroded if left solely to the commercial channels.
Considering it only costs the price of a few DVDs, the licence is great value for an entire year of TV and radio entertainment. The alternative is to start down the slippery slope to the US payment model, which while being 'free', shoves commercials and sponsorship continuously down your throat.
James Styles, England
The TV Licence fee should be scrapped. We must be the laughing stock of the modern world and should have a democratic right to our say in this extra tax!
Broadcasting, be it television or radio, is hugely important. It effects everybody's lives in every way and for many is one of the main sources of information, education and entertainment. Do we really want to live in a society where radio and television is only run by people whose prime concern is making profit for shareholders?
|
See also:
16 Jan 03 | Entertainment
28 Oct 02 | Entertainment
04 Dec 02 | Politics
26 Nov 02 | Entertainment
03 Dec 02 | Entertainment
05 Jun 02 | Politics
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Entertainment stories now:
Links to more Entertainment stories are at the foot of the page.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to more Entertainment stories |
![]() |
||
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> | To BBC World Service>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |